ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Assessment of motor skills in 5-6 year old Italian children using the MABC-2: a preliminary study
Abstract
The Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2) is a standardized test used to assess movement skills in children aged between 3-16 years old and to diagnose developmental coordination disorders (DCDs). Monitoring movement skills in children’s is crucial to ensuring their proper physical development, as movement difficulties affect other areas of learning. In particular, it was interesting to investigate the role of gender and age in relation to different movement skills, as their development is influenced by genetic potential, in order which variables can help teachers to predict movement difficulties. The aim of the present study was to quantify the children's movement performance and to analyze the influence of gender, age and the gender x age interaction on movement performance. Methods: The sample consisted of 102 children aged between 5-6 years old from kindergartens. The MABC-2 was used to assess the children's movement performance, which comprised three sub-sections: manual skills, ball skills and balance skills. MANOVA was performed to assess the impact of gender, age and gender x age on performance. Chi Square was used to test differences in movement difficulties among gender. Results: The results showed a significant impact of both gender and age on performance individually, with a significant interaction effect of gender and age on performance. Conclusions: 12 children had several movement difficulties, while only 9 were at risk of DCDs, requiring ecological intervention.
Keywords
- kindergartens
- dexterity
- balance
- accuracy
- testing
Jump to section
References
1 Raiola G, Aliberti S. Outdoor sports and physical activity during social distancing by sports sciences and exercise course students at the University of Salerno. J Phys Educ Sport 2021; 21(1): 612–617. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s1071
2 Raiola G, Aliberti S, Esposito G, Altavilla G, D'Isanto T, D'Elia F. How has the practice of physical activity changed during the covid-19 quarantine? a preliminary survey. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ 2020; 20(4): 242–247. doi: 10.17309/tmfv.2020.4.07
3 López-Bueno R, López-Sánchez GF, Casajús JA, Calatayud J, Tully MA, Smith L. Potential health-related behaviors for pre-school and school-aged children during COVID-19 lockdown: A narrative review. Prev Med 2021; 143: 106349. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106349
4 Istat. Spazi in casa e disponibilità di computer per bambini e ragazzi. 2020. Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/files/2020/04/Spazi-casa-disponibilita-computer-ragazzi.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2022)
5 D'Elia F, D'Isanto T. Body, movement, and outdoor education in pre-school during covid-19: Perceptions of future teachers during university training. J Phys Educ Sport 2021; 21(1): 580–584. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s1066
6 D'Isanto T, D'Elia F. Body, movement, and outdoor education in pre-school during the covid-19 pandemic: Perceptions of teachers. J Phys Educ Sport 2021; 2: 709–713. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.67
7 D'Elia F, Tortella P, Sannicandro I, D'Isanto T. Design and teaching of physical education for children and youth. J Hum Sport Exerc 2020; 15(4proc): S1527–S1533. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc4.48
8 D‘Elia F. Teachers' perspectives about contents and learning aim of physical education in Italian primary school. J Hum Sport Exerc 2020; 15(2proc): S279–S288. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc2.19
9 Altavilla G, Ceruso R, Esposito G, Raiola G, D’Elia F. Physical education teaching in Italian primary school: theoretical lines and operational proposals. Pedagogy phys cult sports 2022; 26(3): 151–157. doi: 10.15561/26649837.2022.0302
10 Altavilla G, Di Tore PA. Physical education during the first school cycle: a brief social psycho-pedagogical summary. J Phys Educ Sport 2016; 16(2): 340–344. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2016.02055
11 Rundle AG, Park Y, Herbstman JB, Kinsey EW, Wang YC. COVID-19 related school closings and risk of weight gain among children. Obesity 2020; 28(6): 1008. doi: 10.1002/oby.22813
12 Clarke J, Kipping R, Chambers S, et al. Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on preschool children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11: 051497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051497
13 WHO. Every move counts. Le linee guida 2020 OMS su attività fisica e sedentarietà 2020. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/attivita_fisica/linee-guida-oms-2020 (accessed on 27 October 2022)
14 Yanovich E, Bar-Shalom S. Static and Dynamic Balance Indices among Kindergarten Children: A Short-Term Intervention Program during COVID-19 Lockdowns. Children 2022; 9(7): 939. doi: 10.3390/children9070939
15 Yoshikawa H, Wuermli AJ, Britto PR, Dreyer B, Leckman JF, Lye SJ, et al. Effects of the global coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on early childhood development: Short-and long-term risks and mitigating program and policy actions. J Pediatr 2020; 223: 188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.05.020
16 Singer HS, Mink JW, Gilbert DL, Jankovic J. Movement disorders in childhood. Academic Press. 2015.
17 Gallahue D.L.; Ozmun J.C. Understanding motor development. infants, children, adolescents, adults. Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill NY 2006.
18 Cools W, De Martelaer K, Vandaele B, Samaey C, Andries C. Assessment of Movement Skill Performance in Preschool Children: Convergent Validity Between MOT 4-6 and M-ABC. J Sports Sci Med 2010; 9(4): 597–604.
19 Henderson SE, Sugden D, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2. APA PsycTests 2007. doi: 10.1037/t55281-000
20 Schulz J, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: Factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32(4): 1361–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032
21 Wagner MO, Kastner J, Petermann F, Bös K. Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2). Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32(2): 674–680. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.016
22 Ke L, Du W, Wang Y, Duan W, Hua J, Barnett AL. The Movement ABC-2 Test in China: Comparison with UK norms for 3–10 years old. Res Dev Disabil 2020; 105: 103742. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103742
23 De Milander M. Developmental coordination disorder in grade 1 learners. Afr J Phys Health Edu Recreat. Dance 2014; 20(3): 1075–1085.
24 Zoia S, Biancotto M, Guicciardi M, Lecis R, Lucidi F, Pelamatti GM. et al. An evaluation of the Movement ABC-2 Test for use in Italy: A comparison of data from Italy and the UK. Res Dev Disabil 2019; 84: 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.013
25 Faught BE, Demetriades S, Hay J, Cairney J. Does relative body fat influence the Movement ABC-2 assessment in children with and without developmental coordination disorder? Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34(12): 4433–4438. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.016
26 Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Human kinetics. 2004.
27 Richardson, J. T. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev 2011; 6(2): 135–147. doi: 10.5040/9781492596837
28 Webster EK, Martin CK, Staiano AE. Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. JSHS 2019; 8(2): 114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006
29 Kokštejn J, Musálek M, Tufano JJ. Are sex differences in fundamental motor skills uniform throughout the entire preschool period? PloS One 2017; 12(4): e0176556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176556
30 Amador‐Ruiz S, Gutierrez D, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Gulías‐González R, Pardo‐Guijarro MJ, Sánchez-López M. Motor competence levels and prevalence of developmental coordination disorder in Spanish children: The MOVI‐KIDS study. J Sch Health 2018; 88(7): 538–546. doi: 10.1111/josh.12639
31 Stodden D, Langendorfer S, Roberton MA. The association between motor skill competence and physical fitness in young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009; 80: 223–229. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599556
32 Henderson S, Sugden D. Movement assessment battery for children. London: The Psychological Corporation 1992.
33 Seefeldt V. Developmental motor patterns: implications for elementary school physical fitness. In: Nadeau CH, Halliwell WR, Newell KC, Roberts GC, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics 1980: 314–323.
34 Derigny T, Schnitzler F, Gandrieau J, Potdevin F. Resilience of adolescents in physical activity during the covid-19 pandemic: a preliminary case study in France. Phys Act Rev 2022; 10(1): 86–97. doi: 10.16926/par.2022.10.10
35 Russo G, Castagnoli MS, Babini A, Ceciliani A. A post COVID lockdown pilot study on the effect of physical activity intensity on cognitive functions of children aged 6-8 years old. J Hum Sport Exerc 2020; 15(4proc): S1140–S1151. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2020.15.Proc4.15
36 Welis W, Yendrizal, Darni, Mario DT. Physical fitness of students in Indonesian during the COVID-19 period: Physical activity, body mass index, and socioeconomic status. Phys Act Rev 2023; 11(1): 77–87. doi: 10.16926/par.2023.11.10
37 Russo G, Nigro F, Raiola G, Ceciliani A. The effect of physical fitness and physical activity level on memory storage of Italian pre-adolescent secondary school students. Trends Sport Sci 2021; 28(3): 195–202. doi: 10.23829/TSS.2021.28.3-4
38 Russo G, Ottoboni G, Tessari A, Ceciliani A. The positive impact of physical activity on working memory abilities: Evidence from a large Italian pre-adolescent sample. J Hum Sport Exerc 2021, 16(2proc): S277-S288. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc2.13
Article information
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Phys Act Rev. 2024;12(1):112-120.DOI: 10.16926/par.2024.12.11
How to Cite
D’Isanto, T., Aliberti, S., Raiola, G., & D’Elia, F. (2024). Assessment of motor skills in 5-6 year old Italian children using the MABC-2: a preliminary study. Physical Activity Review, 12(1), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2024.12.11
